Sennheiser HD 25
Sennheiser
43 종합 점수
vs
TOZO HT3
TOZO
85 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Work
Music
Commute
Studio
Calls
사양
| Sennheiser HD 25 | TOZO HT3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.14 kg★ | 0.25 kg |
| Ear Cushion | — | Sponge |
| Headband | — | Silicone Protein Sponge |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 16 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 70 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 120 dB★ | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | TOZO HT3 Hybrid Noise Cancelling Headphones, 90H Playtime Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth Headset, Spatial Audio AI Chat with 5 Mics, Supports Dual Connection and USB-C Input, with 32 EQ Music Modes, Pink |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | 3 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 90 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 9 hours playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Other |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | TOZO |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
장단점
Sennheiser HD 25
- Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong comfort (75th percentile)
- Below average mic (21st percentile)
- Below average anc (34th percentile)
TOZO HT3
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
가격
Sennheiser HD 250.287달러당 점수
vs
TOZO HT32.116달러당 점수
TOZO HT3 7.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: TOZO HT3
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.
