Beyerdynamic DT 770M
Beyerdynamic
16 종합 점수
vs
TOZO HT3
TOZO
92 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Work
Music
Commute
Calls
Studio
사양
| Beyerdynamic DT 770M | TOZO HT3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.82 kg | 0.25 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | Sponge |
| Headband | — | Silicone Protein Sponge |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 80 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | TOZO HT3 Hybrid Noise Cancelling Headphones, 90H Battery Life Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth 6.0 Foldable Headset, AI Voice Assistant with 5 Mics, Connect 2 Devices and Hi-Res Sound, 32 EQ Audio Presets |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 90 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 9 hours playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Other |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | TOZO |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
장단점
Beyerdynamic DT 770M
- Below average comfort (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
TOZO HT3
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
가격
Beyerdynamic DT 770M0.081달러당 점수
vs
TOZO HT33.051달러당 점수
TOZO HT3 37.7배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: TOZO HT3
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 37 specs.
