TOZO Crystal Pods
TOZO
85 종합 점수
vs
Maeline PFH-L0
Maeline
27 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Music
사양
| TOZO Crystal Pods | Maeline PFH-L0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | — |
| Ear Tips | Medium | — |
| Weight | 0.04 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | 3.5 mm |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | LDAC | Maeline 5 Pack Earbuds in-Ear Stereo Headphones for School Classroom, Library, Travel, Gym 3.5mm Jack, Tangle-Free Wired Earphones for MP3, Phones, Computer and Laptops, Black |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 35 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 4★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Other | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | TOZO App | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | — |
장단점
TOZO Crystal Pods
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Maeline PFH-L0
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Below average sound (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (35th percentile)
가격
TOZO Crystal Pods5.245달러당 점수
vs
Maeline PFH-L03.942달러당 점수
TOZO Crystal Pods 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: TOZO Crystal Pods
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 36 specs.
