TOZO Crystal Pods
TOZO
84 종합 점수
vs
SIAWAG BTW62H-Metal Gray
SIAWAG
54 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Music
사양
| TOZO Crystal Pods | SIAWAG BTW62H-Metal Gray | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | — |
| Ear Tips | Medium | — |
| Weight | 0.04 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | LDAC | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs | 7.5 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 35 hrs | 70 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Other | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | TOZO App | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | Waterproof |
장단점
TOZO Crystal Pods
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
SIAWAG BTW62H-Metal Gray
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong anc (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong sound (79th percentile)
- Strong build (73rd percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
가격
TOZO Crystal Pods5.239달러당 점수
vs
SIAWAG BTW62H-Metal Gray3.371달러당 점수
TOZO Crystal Pods 1.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: TOZO Crystal Pods
Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 36 specs.
