JVC Gumy Plus HA-FX5-B
JVC
34 종합 점수
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods
TOZO
85 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Music
사양
| JVC Gumy Plus HA-FX5-B | TOZO Crystal Pods | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | in-ear | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | Medium |
| Weight | 0.00 kg★ | 0.04 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 11 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 11★ | — |
| Freq Min | 10 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB★ | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | — |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play |
| Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 35 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Other |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | iOS | TOZO App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX5 |
장단점
JVC Gumy Plus HA-FX5-B
- Strong sound (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)
- Below average social proof (31st percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
TOZO Crystal Pods
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
가격
JVC Gumy Plus HA-FX5-B4.293달러당 점수
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods5.264달러당 점수
TOZO Crystal Pods 1.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: TOZO Crystal Pods
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 37 specs.
