Technics EAH-AZ100-K
Technics
100 종합 점수
vs
Fhumsh i17
Fhumsh
37 종합 점수
점수
Calls
Travel
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
사양
| Technics EAH-AZ100-K | Fhumsh i17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | — |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones HiFi Stereo 50H Playback LED Digital Display Ear Buds with ENC Noise Canceling Headset, IPX7 Waterproof Earphones for Running/Workout (Black) |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | Environmental Noise Cancellation |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | 7.5 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | Type-C fast charging |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 50 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | activate voice assistants |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX7 |
장단점
Technics EAH-AZ100-K
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
Fhumsh i17
- Strong battery (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong anc (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong connectivity (74th percentile)
- Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average sound (30th percentile)
- Below average build (35th percentile)
가격
Technics EAH-AZ100-K0.429달러당 점수
vs
Fhumsh i173.857달러당 점수
Fhumsh i17 9.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Technics EAH-AZ100-K
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 38 specs.
