JBL JBLT110WHTAME

JBL JBLT110WHTAME

JBL
41 종합 점수
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Technics
100 종합 점수

점수

Calls
JBL
28
Technics
99
Travel
JBL
31
Technics
98
Budget
JBL
48
Technics
93
Music
JBL
45
Technics
90
Commute
JBL
30
Technics
89
Gaming
JBL
40
Technics
87
Fitness
JBL
32
Technics
80

사양

JBL JBLT110WHTAMETechnics EAH-AZ100-K
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear Tips3 x Ear Tip Sizes5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.01 kg0.05 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size9 mm10 mm
Drivers91
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz40 kHz
Impedance16 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

장단점

JBL JBLT110WHTAME

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong sound (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average connectivity (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (33rd percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100-K

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile

가격

JBL JBLT110WHTAME is US$221 cheaper (19.5x less).

JBL JBLT110WHTAME3.389달러당 점수
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100-K0.429달러당 점수

JBL JBLT110WHTAME 7.9배 더 나은 가성비

결론

승자: Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-K 더 나은 점:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

이것도 고려해보세요