Apple SweetFlow

Apple SweetFlow

Apple
48 종합 점수
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab
86 종합 점수

점수

Gaming
Apple
40
JLab
84
Calls
Apple
33
JLab
83
Travel
Apple
28
JLab
82
Commute
Apple
27
JLab
81
Budget
Apple
53
JLab
78
Fitness
Apple
49
JLab
76
Music
Apple
33
JLab
69

사양

Apple SweetFlowJLab Jbuds Pods ANC
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylerounded_tipstem
Ear TipslS, M, L
Weight0.01 kg0.12 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm11 mm
Drivers11
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsSBC, AAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorLightning
Earbud Battery
Battery Life10 hrs
Charge Time0.16699999570846558 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 2 hours playback
ChargingLightningUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery56 hrs
Case ChargingLightningUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiriGoogle Assistant
Touch Controls
AppiOSJlab App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIP55

장단점

Apple SweetFlow

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (67th percentile)
  • Below average battery (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average sound (32nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile

가격

Apple SweetFlow is US$29 cheaper (2.4x less).

Apple SweetFlow2.287달러당 점수
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC1.716달러당 점수

Apple SweetFlow 1.3배 더 나은 가성비

Apple SweetFlow

결론

승자: JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 35 specs.

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC 더 나은 점:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

이것도 고려해보세요