Apple SweetFlow

Apple SweetFlow

Apple
48 종합 점수
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 종합 점수

점수

Gaming
Apple
40
TOZO
80
Budget
Apple
53
TOZO
80
Travel
Apple
28
TOZO
78
Fitness
Apple
49
TOZO
72
Calls
Apple
33
TOZO
70
Commute
Apple
27
TOZO
70
Music
Apple
33
TOZO
68

사양

Apple SweetFlowTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylerounded_tiptrue wireless
Ear TipslMedium
Weight0.01 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorLightning
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingLightningUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingLightningUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiriOther
Touch Controls
AppiOSTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX5

장단점

Apple SweetFlow

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong build (74th percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (67th percentile)
  • Below average battery (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average sound (32nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

가격

TOZO Crystal Pods is US$5 cheaper (1.3x less).

Apple SweetFlow2.287달러당 점수
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods5.239달러당 점수

TOZO Crystal Pods 2.3배 더 나은 가성비

Apple SweetFlow

결론

승자: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 37 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods 더 나은 점:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

이것도 고려해보세요