JBL Live Pro Live Pro 2
JBL
89 종합 점수
vs
Skullcandy Indy Evo
Skullcandy
29 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Calls
Travel
Fitness
Gaming
Commute
Music
사양
| JBL Live Pro Live Pro 2 | Skullcandy Indy Evo | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 3x Different-Sized Pair of Ear Tips | — |
| Weight | 0.06 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 11 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | — |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP 1.3, AVRCP 1.6, HFP 1.7 | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 10 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 4 Hours | Rapid Charge |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 30 hrs | 30 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Alexa | assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JBL Headphones App | Tile |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IP55 |
장단점
JBL Live Pro Live Pro 2
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile
Skullcandy Indy Evo
- Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Below average battery (24th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (31th percentile)
가격
JBL Live Pro Live Pro 21.482달러당 점수
vs
Skullcandy Indy Evo0.720달러당 점수
JBL Live Pro Live Pro 2 2.1배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: JBL Live Pro Live Pro 2
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 36 specs.
