ACEMAGIC M5 2026
ACEMAGIC
54 종합 점수
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
HP
95 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Business
Creator
Developer
Home Office
Workstation
Ai Llm
Compact
사양
| ACEMAGIC M5 | HP OMEN GT16-0364 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core i5 14500HX | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 14★ | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB★ | 16 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 12 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | Shared | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mini | mid-tower |
| PSU | 55W | 850W★ |
| Weight | 1.35 kg | 14.50 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| USB Ports | 6 | 8★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | 0 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.0 | 1 x HDMI |
| DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort 1.4b | 3 x DisplayPort |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
장단점
ACEMAGIC M5 2026
- Strong port selection (73rd percentile)
- Strong storage (73rd percentile)
- Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average gpu (31st percentile)
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
가격
ACEMAGIC M5 20260.104달러당 점수
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053달러당 점수
ACEMAGIC M5 2026 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: HP OMEN GT16-0364
Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 26 specs.
