Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
Intel
43 종합 점수
vs
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 4677
HP
75 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Gaming
Efficiency
사양
| Intel Celeron G5900 | HP Xeon 6526Y | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Celeron | Xeon Gold |
| Model | G5900 | 6526Y |
| Codename | Comet Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | 14★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 2 | 16★ |
| P-cores | 4★ | — |
| Threads | 2 | 32★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 1 | 32★ |
| L3 Cache | 2 | 37★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1200 | LGA 4677 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 80★ |
| TDP | 58★ | 195 |
| Unlocked | ✗ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | No |
장단점
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
- Strong affordability (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong platform (76th percentile)
- Below average ai (26th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (29th percentile)
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 4677
- Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong multi thread (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong single thread (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
가격
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 12001.203달러당 점수
vs
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 46770.036달러당 점수
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200 33.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: HP Xeon 6526Y
Scores 75 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 26 specs.
