Intel Xeon 4216 16-core LGA 3647
Intel
52 종합 점수
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
G.Skill
65 종합 점수
점수
Efficiency
Productivity
Gaming
Budget
Ai Llm
Server
사양
| Intel Xeon 4216 | G.Skill Trident Z Neo | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Xeon | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | 4216 | 3600 |
| Codename | — | Matisse |
| Class | server | desktop |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 16★ | 6 |
| P-cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | 32★ | 12 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 8★ | 3 |
| L3 Cache | 22 | 32★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | — | 32★ |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 3647 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | 100 | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
장단점
Intel Xeon 4216 16-core LGA 3647
- Strong efficiency (78th percentile)
- Strong ai (77th percentile)
- Strong multi thread (76th percentile)
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
- Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong efficiency (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong platform (78th percentile)
- Strong ai (72nd percentile)
- Below average affordability (21st percentile)
가격
Intel Xeon 4216 16-core LGA 36470.076달러당 점수
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM40.175달러당 점수
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4 2.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: G.Skill Trident Z Neo
Scores 65 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 25 specs.
