Intel Xeon E5-2695 V3 14-core LGA 2011-3
Intel
49 종합 점수
vs
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Budget
Gaming
사양
| Intel Xeon E5-2695 V3 | Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Xeon | — |
| Model | E5-2695 V3 | 000 |
| Class | server | desktop |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 14★ | — |
| Threads | 28★ | — |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 3.5★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 35★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4★ | — |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 2011-3 | AM5 |
| TDP | 120★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
장단점
Intel Xeon E5-2695 V3 14-core LGA 2011-3
- Strong ai (73rd percentile)
- Strong multi thread (73rd percentile)
- Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
가격
Intel Xeon E5-2695 V3 14-core LGA 2011-30.098달러당 점수
vs
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM50.554달러당 점수
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5 5.7배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Xeon E5-2695 V3
Scores 49 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.
