Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6138 20-core LGA3647
Intel
58 종합 점수
점수
Server
Productivity
Ai Llm
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
사양
| Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 | Intel Xeon Gold 6138 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Xeon Gold |
| Model | 000 | 6138 |
| Codename | — | Milan |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 20★ |
| P-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 40★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 20★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 27.5★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 3647 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 데이터 없음 | |
| TDP | — | 125★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 150★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
장단점
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Xeon Gold 6138 20-core LGA3647
- Strong ai (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong platform (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong multi thread (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong efficiency (74th percentile)
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (22nd percentile)
가격
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM50.554달러당 점수
vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6138 20-core LGA36470.268달러당 점수
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 2.1배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Xeon Gold 6138
Scores 58 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 25 specs.
