MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 종합 점수
vs
Intel Core i9 12900KS 16-core LGA 1700
Intel
85 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Ai Llm
Gaming
Budget
Server
Efficiency
사양
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Intel Core i9 12900KS | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Core i9 |
| Model | — | 12900KS |
| Codename | — | Alder Lake |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| P-cores | — | 8★ |
| E-cores | — | 8★ |
| Threads | — | 24★ |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 14★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 30★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA 1700 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20★ |
| TDP | — | 150★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 241★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
장단점
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Intel Core i9 12900KS 16-core LGA 1700
- Strong single thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong platform (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ai (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong multi thread (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average affordability (14th percentile)14th %ile
가격
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.067달러당 점수
vs
Intel Core i9 12900KS 16-core LGA 17000.400달러당 점수
Intel Core i9 12900KS 16-core LGA 1700 6.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Core i9 12900KS
Scores 85 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 28 specs.
