AMD 4564P
AMD
85 종합 점수
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
사양
| AMD 4564P | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | — |
| Series | Ryzen 5 | — |
| Model | 4564P | — |
| Codename | Raphael | — |
| Class | server | — |
| Process | 5★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 16★ | — |
| P-cores | 16★ | — |
| Threads | 32★ | — |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 16★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 64★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | — |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | — |
| PCIe | 5.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28★ | — |
| TDP | 200★ | — |
| Max Turbo Power | 230★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics | — |
장단점
AMD 4564P
- Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong single thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong efficiency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
가격
AMD 4564P0.110달러당 점수
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.067달러당 점수
AMD 4564P 1.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: AMD 4564P
Scores 85 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 26 specs.
