Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20-core LGA1851
Intel
87 종합 점수
vs
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 종합 점수
점수
Efficiency
Budget
Productivity
Ai Llm
Gaming
Server
사양
| Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core Ultra 7 | — |
| Model | 265F | 000 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 3★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 20★ | — |
| P-cores | 8★ | — |
| E-cores | 12★ | — |
| Threads | 20★ | — |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 36★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 30★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | — |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | ✗ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24★ | — |
| TDP | 65★ | — |
| Max Turbo Power | 182★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | None | — |
| NPU TOPS | 3.5★ | — |
장단점
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20-core LGA1851
- Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong multi thread (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
가격
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20-core LGA18510.249달러당 점수
vs
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM50.554달러당 점수
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5 2.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Scores 87 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 19 of 29 specs.
