AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME
AMD
40 종합 점수
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
G.Skill
65 종합 점수
점수
Efficiency
Productivity
Gaming
Budget
Ai Llm
Server
사양
| AMD EPYC 7532 | G.Skill Trident Z Neo | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | EPYC | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | 7532 | 3600 |
| Codename | Rome | Matisse |
| Class | server | desktop |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 32★ | 6 |
| P-cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | — | 12★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 3★ |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 8★ | 2 |
| Max Memory | — | 32★ |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | EPYC ROME | AMD Socket AM4 |
| PCIe | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | ||
| TDP | 200 | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
장단점
AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME
- Strong platform (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (77th percentile)
- Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average affordability (26th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (31st percentile)
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
- Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong efficiency (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong platform (78th percentile)
- Strong ai (72nd percentile)
- Below average affordability (21st percentile)
가격
AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME0.145달러당 점수
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM40.175달러당 점수
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4 1.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: G.Skill Trident Z Neo
Scores 65 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 25 specs.
