Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366
Intel
35 종합 점수
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700
Intel
79 종합 점수
점수
Efficiency
Productivity
Ai Llm
Gaming
Server
Budget
사양
| Intel X5650 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | — | Core Ultra 9 |
| Model | X5650 | 285 |
| Codename | — | Zen |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 6 | 24★ |
| P-cores | — | 8★ |
| E-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | 12 | 24★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 4★ |
| L3 Cache | 12 | 16★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 3★ | — |
| Max Memory | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1366 | LGA 1700 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | 95 | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
장단점
Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366
- Strong affordability (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (65th percentile)
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average single thread (26th percentile)
- Below average ai (31st percentile)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700
- Strong efficiency (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong multi thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong platform (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average affordability (14th percentile)14th %ile
가격
Intel X5650 6-core LGA13661.859달러당 점수
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 17000.130달러당 점수
Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366 14.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 26 specs.
