Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
Intel
38 종합 점수
vs
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
be quiet!
40 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Productivity
Gaming
Efficiency
Ai Llm
Server
사양
| Intel Celeron G3900 | Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Celeron | Ryzen 3 |
| Model | G3900 | 1200 |
| Codename | — | Zen |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 2 | 4★ |
| P-cores | — | 4★ |
| Threads | 2 | 4★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 0.5 | 2★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 8★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | 51★ | 270 |
| Unlocked | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 510 | — |
장단점
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average ai (24th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (27th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (35th percentile)
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM4
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong affordability (76th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (27th percentile)
가격
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 11511.013달러당 점수
vs
Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 4-core AM40.442달러당 점수
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151 2.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5
Scores 40 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 24 specs.
