Anker SoloCam T8170
Anker
30 종합 점수
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S5 II S5 II Black 2023
Panasonic
97 종합 점수
점수
Beginner
Video
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Youtube
Photography
Product Photography
Travel
Vlogging
Streaming
사양
| Anker SoloCam T8170 | Panasonic LUMIX S5 II S5 II | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 3 MP | 24.200000762939453 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | Venus Engine |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 데이터 없음 | |
| AF Type | — | Photo, VideoContrast Detection, Phase Detection: 779 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 6K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 100 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264/H.265/MOV/MP4/ProRes 4:2:2/4:2:0 8/10-Bit |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 3.7M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.63 kg★ | 0.66 kg |
| Battery Life | — | 370 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI Output |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
장단점
Anker SoloCam T8170
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (79th percentile)
- Below average sensor (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average video (24th percentile)
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S5 II S5 II Black 2023
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
가격
Anker SoloCam T81700.217달러당 점수
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S5 II S5 II Black 20230.061달러당 점수
Anker SoloCam T8170 3.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Panasonic LUMIX S5 II S5 II
Scores 97 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 23 of 33 specs.
