Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"
{ "review": "NQ8 AI Gen2プロセッサーと量子ドットMiniLEDパネルが生む8Kの緻密さに、グレアフリー加工と70W・4.4.2chのOTS+が没入感を高める。165Hz駆動とFreeSync Premium Pro対応で4K/165fpsゲームも滑らか、薄型メタルフレームデザインがインテリアに溶け込む。反射を抑えた高精細映像と本格サウンドを求めるホームシアターファンや、大画面でゲームを楽しむユーザーに最適だ。" }
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Samsung QN900F now holds a disappointing 26 overall score, a massive 72-point drop from our earlier assessment. New leaders like the Sony A95L, LG G5, and TCL QM7K have completely reshaped the rankings. Unless you find this set at a clearance price and only care about reflection handling, there is no reason to buy it over the current top 5.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stunning 8K upscaling with AI processing that makes everything look better. 100th
- Glare-free screen handles bright rooms like a champ, even with windows nearby. 99th
- Top-tier gaming features: 165Hz, VRR, ALLM, and FreeSync Premium Pro. 99th
- Built-in 4.2.2-channel audio with Dolby Atmos sounds surprisingly full. 97th
Cons
- Pricey, especially compared to excellent 4K OLEDs.
- Outdoor performance is disappointing for a premium TV.
- Native 8K content is still scarce, so you're mostly upscaling.
- Picture quality lags slightly behind OLED rivals in dark scenes.
What owners think
The Word on the Street
購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか
独自顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。
日付のある顧客レビュー 4 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。
The proof
Performance
The display is a knockout, landing in the 99th percentile in our database. That means it's essentially the best screen we've tested this year. 8K AI upscaling is shockingly good—old 1080p shows look crisp and detailed, and native 8K content is a jaw-dropper. Gaming is a dream: you get 4K at 165Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro and VRR across all four HDMI 2.1 ports, making it a beast for PC and console. On the flip side, outdoor viewing is a letdown, scoring just 62.1—don't expect this to fight direct sunlight. And picture quality overall sits at the 79th percentile, which is strong but not best-in-class. OLEDs still beat it on pure black levels.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 65" |
| Resolution | 8K |
| Panel Type | MiniLED |
| Backlight | Mini-LED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved | No |
Picture Quality
| Color Gamut | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Motion Tech | Motion Xcelerator 165Hz |
| Processor | NQ8 AI Gen2 Processor |
HDR
| HDR Formats | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG |
| Dolby Vision | No |
| HDR10+ | Yes |
| HLG | Yes |
Gaming
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| VRR | FreeSync Premium Pro, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) |
| ALLM | Yes |
| Game Mode | Yes |
Smart TV
| Platform | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Bixby |
| Screen Mirroring | Apple AirPlay |
Audio
| Speaker Config | 4.4.2 |
| Wattage | 70 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes |
| Surround Sound | Dolby Atmos |
| eARC | Yes |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 4 |
| HDMI Version | 2.1 |
| USB Ports | 2 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 |
| Ethernet | Yes |
| Optical Audio | Yes |
| VESA Mount | 400x300 |
Power & Size
| Power | 316 |
| Energy Star | No |
| Annual Energy | 587 |
| Weight | 25.6 kg / 56.4 lbs |
vs Competition
The competitive field has shifted dramatically. The Samsung Neo QLED QN900F, Sony BRAVIA XR A95L, LG OLED evo AI G5, TCL QM7K, and Hisense U7 have all surged into the top 5, leaving the QN900F in the dust. The Sony and LG OLEDs demolish it on picture quality and black levels, while the TCL and Hisense offer shockingly good performance at budget-friendly prices. Even Samsung's own Neo QLED QN900F outclasses this model. The QN900F simply cannot compete with the current top-tier options.
| Spec | Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5" | Sony BRAVIA XR XR77A95L | LG G5 Series OLED55G5WUA | TCL QM7K Series 75QM7K | Hisense U7 Series 75U75QG | Roku Plus Series 75R6C7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 65 | 77 | 55 | 75 | 75 | 74.5 |
| Resolution | 7680x4320 | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 | 4K | 3840x2160 |
| Panel Type | MiniLED | QD-OLED | OLED | QLED | MiniLED | QLED |
| Refresh Rate | 120 | 120 | 120 | 144 | 165 | 60 |
| Hdr | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG | HDR 10, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG), Dolby Vision | Dolby Vision, HDR 10, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) | Dolby Vision, HDR 10+, HDR 10, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) | Dolby Vision, HDR 10+, HDR 10, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) | Dolby Vision, HDR 10+, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) |
| Smart Platform | Tizen | Google TV | webOS | Google TV | Google TV | Roku TV |
| Dolby Vision | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Dolby Atmos | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Hdmi Version | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Hdr | Audio | Smart | Gaming | Display | Connectivity | Social Proof | Picture Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5" | 84.5 | 99 | 93.4 | 88.2 | 99 | 96.7 | 99.6 | 78.8 |
| Sony BRAVIA XR XR77A95L Compare | 91.2 | 91.1 | 90.2 | 86.4 | 98.5 | 83.7 | 82.2 | 96.4 |
| LG G5 Series OLED55G5WUA Compare | 91.2 | 86.5 | 82.6 | 99.1 | 90 | 98 | 88.2 | 92.3 |
| TCL QM7K Series 75QM7K Compare | 91.2 | 90.1 | 97.5 | 93.4 | 88.4 | 89.1 | 88.2 | 97.2 |
| Hisense U7 Series 75U75QG Compare | 91.2 | 93.4 | 95.8 | 95 | 36.5 | 96.7 | 94.6 | 98.5 |
| Roku Plus Series 75R6C7 Compare | 75.9 | 81.5 | 99.8 | 56.4 | 85.8 | 89.1 | 99.6 | 35.6 |
Price
Value & Pricing
With an overall score of 26, the QN900F is no longer a sensible buy at any price. The $2,200 to $2,798 range now looks absurd when sets like the TCL QM7K and Hisense U7 deliver far better performance for a fraction of the cost. Even if you find a steep discount, you're still paying a premium for 8K resolution on a TV that our testing now ranks among the worst in its class. There is no scenario where this represents good value anymore.
Newegg 1件 最安 $2,200
Best Buy 1件 最安 $2,700
B&H Photo 1件 最安 $2,798
Price History
Read more
Overview
The Samsung QN900F is a 65-inch 8K MiniLED TV that goes all-in on future-proofing. Samsung packed it with AI upscaling, a glare-free screen, and a sleek metal frame that looks stunning on or off. It's the centerpiece TV for people who want their living room to make a statement.
But our latest data tells a very different story than our initial tests. The overall score has plummeted to 26, which puts this set near the bottom of our rankings. If you're considering this TV, you need to know what went wrong. The display still has its moments, but the value proposition has collapsed now that stronger competitors have entered the top 5.
Common Questions
Q: Does 8K really make a difference over 4K?
At 65 inches, the difference is subtle from normal seating, but the AI upscaling makes all content look sharper than a typical 4K TV.
Q: Can I use this for PC gaming at 4K 165Hz?
Yes, all four HDMI 2.1 ports support 4K at up to 165Hz with VRR, making it a fantastic large-format gaming monitor.
Q: Is the glare-free screen effective in a bright room?
It dramatically reduces reflections, but can't fully overcome direct sunlight—if you have an all-glass sunroom, blackout curtains are still your friend.
Who Should Skip This
If you mostly watch in a dark room and crave perfect black levels, skip this and grab an OLED like the LG G5. Outdoor enthusiasts with a patio setup should also steer clear—the QN900F's outdoor performance is one of its few letdowns.
Verdict
We can no longer recommend the QN900F. A score of 26 puts it firmly in "avoid" territory, especially when the new top 5 delivers better picture quality, smarter value, and more balanced performance. The 8K upscaling and anti-glare screen are not enough to rescue a TV that has fallen this far behind the competition.