SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk
90 総合スコア
vs
Netac NV3000

Netac NV3000

Netac
50 総合スコア

スコア

Console
SanDisk
86
Netac
18
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Netac
54
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Netac
39
Budget
SanDisk
72
Netac
37
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Netac
40
Portable
SanDisk
24
Netac
11

スペック

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Netac NV3000
Drive
Capacity
8,000
250
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
3,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,400
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
データなし
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
データなし
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
300
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
データなし
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓★—

長所と短所

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Netac NV3000

  • Strong endurance (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (13th percentile)13th %ile

価格

Netac NV3000 is $2,000 cheaper (41.3x less).

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 81000.044ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Netac NV30001.015ドルあたりのスコア

Netac NV3000 23.1倍のコストパフォーマンス

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Netac NV3000

結論

★ 勝者: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 優れている点:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

こちらもおすすめ