Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 Green
Kingston
33 総合スコア
vs
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
Netac
58 総合スコア
スコア
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
スペック
| Kingston ValueRAM | Netac Shadow III | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 240 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 11★ | 16 |
| Timings | 11-11-11 | — |
| Voltage | 1.5 | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Not Applicable | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
長所と短所
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 Green
- Strong affordability (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong affordability (79th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
価格
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 Green1.458ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White0.814ドルあたりのスコア
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 Green 1.8倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Netac Shadow III
Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.
