Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 総合スコア
vs
Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D 14mm
Laowa
26 総合スコア
スコア
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
スペック
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D 14mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 14 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 70 mm | 14 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 13 |
| Groups | 12 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | Fluorine Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 5 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Canon EF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.32 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | RXD | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm | 145 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:4.8 | 1:3.33 |
長所と短所
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D 14mm
- Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong build (74th percentile)
- Strong optical (71st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average bokeh (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
価格
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.170ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D 14mm0.058ドルあたりのスコア
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 2.9倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
