Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro 100mm
Laowa
40 総合スコア
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Tamron
97 総合スコア
スコア
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
スペック
| Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro 100mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 10 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony FE, L Mount, Nikon Z, Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.22 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:1 | 1:4.8 |
長所と短所
Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro 100mm
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
価格
Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro 100mm0.080ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.162ドルあたりのスコア
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm 2.0倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
