Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 総合スコア
vs
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
Canon
78 総合スコア
スコア
Video Cinema
Landscape
Budget
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Macro
Street
Portrait
スペック
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 105 mm |
| Elements | — | 23 |
| Groups | — | 18 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon RF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 1.31 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Nano USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 450 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.29x★ |
長所と短所
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average build (24th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
価格
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z0.026ドルあたりのスコア
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 2.5倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
Scores 78 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.
