Sigma 883101 18-250mm

Sigma 883101 18-250mm

Sigma
73 総合スコア
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 総合スコア

スコア

Budget
Sigma
79
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
56
Nikon
94
Travel
Sigma
63
Nikon
92
Landscape
Sigma
56
Nikon
88
Professional
Sigma
55
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
64
Nikon
82
Street
Sigma
66
Nikon
81
Portrait
Sigma
68
Nikon
78
Macro
Sigma
74
Nikon
74

スペック

Sigma 883101 18-250mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min18 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm200 mm
Elements—19
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—1★
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-6.34-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.47 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMicromotor-type AF motorstepping motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:2.9★0.28x

長所と短所

Sigma 883101 18-250mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

価格

Both products are similarly priced.

結論

★ 勝者: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR 優れている点:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

こちらもおすすめ