HP EliteBook 16" 865 G11 2026
HP
57 総合スコア
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 2024
Apple
99 総合スコア
スコア
Entertainment
Business
Student
Developer
Compact
Creator
Ai Llm
Gaming
スペック
| HP EliteBook 16" 865 G11 | Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen 7 8840U | Apple M4 Max★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 8 | 14★ |
| Frequency | 3.3 GHz★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | AMD Radeon 780M Graphics | Apple (32-Core) |
| Type | integrated★ | — |
| VRAM Type | Shared | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB | 36 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 8 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 16" | 14.2" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 3024 px★ |
| Panel | IPS | Mini-LED★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 45% NTSC | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| USB Ports | 2★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | 1x HDMI Output |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.75 kg | 1.60 kg★ |
| Battery | 76 Wh★ | 72 Wh |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | macOS |
長所と短所
HP EliteBook 16" 865 G11 2026
- Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong port (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong storage (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong cpu (74th percentile)
- Below average gpu (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average compact (27th percentile)
- Below average reliability (32th percentile)
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 2024
- Strong storage (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong reliability (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average gpu (19th percentile)19th %ile
価格
HP EliteBook 16" 865 G11 20260.030ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max Silver 20240.018ドルあたりのスコア
HP EliteBook 16" 865 G11 2026 1.7倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Max
Scores 99 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 27 specs.