Samsung QN85D 75"
Samsung
92 Punteggio complessivo
vs
TCL 4-Series 85S455 85"
TCL
33 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Smart Home
Streaming
Budget
Corporate
Sports
Movies
Gaming
Outdoor
Portable
Specifiche
| Samsung QN85D 75" | TCL 4-Series 85S455 85" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 75" | 85" |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Panel Type | QD-Mini-LED★ | LED |
| Backlight | Mini-LED★ | LED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Color Gamut | Neo Quantum HDR | — |
| Motion Tech | Motion Xcelerator 120 Hz | — |
| Processor | NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor | — |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG | HDR |
| Dolby Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | ✓★ | ✗ |
| HLG | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| VRR | Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | — |
| ALLM | ✓★ | — |
| Game Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Tizen | Roku TV |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant, SmartThings | Siri, Alexa, Hey Google |
| Screen Mirroring | SmartThings, Apple AirPlay | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | 2.2 | — |
| Wattage | 40W★ | — |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓★ | — |
| Surround Sound | Object Tracking Sound Lite | — |
| eARC | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 4 | 4 |
| HDMI Version | 2.1★ | — |
| USB Ports | 2★ | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2★ | — |
| Ethernet | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Optical Audio | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 400x400 | — |
| Power & Size | ||
| Energy Star | ✗ | — |
| Annual Energy | 184 kWh★ | — |
| Weight | 33.10 kg★ | 46.31 kg |
Pro e Contro
Samsung QN85D 75"
- Strong smart (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong display (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong audio (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
TCL 4-Series 85S455 85"
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average audio (15th percentile)15th %ile
Prezzi
Samsung QN85D 75"0.057punteggio per dollaro
vs
TCL 4-Series 85S455 85"0.026punteggio per dollaro
Samsung QN85D 75" offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.2x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Samsung QN85D 75"
Scores 92 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 15 of 36 specs.
