Samsung Galaxy Tab S 14.6" Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus
Samsung
37 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Surface Pro 11 Platinum 2025
Microsoft
76 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Art Design
Entertainment
Productivity
Reading
Student
Business
Specifiche
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S 14.6" Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus | Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Surface Pro 11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2 GHz | Intel Core Ultra 7 266V★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Dati non disponibili | |
| Cores | — | 8★ |
| GPU | — | Arc Graphics★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Dati non disponibili | |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage | 12 GB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage Type | — | SSD★ |
| Expandable | — | ✗ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14.6" | 13" |
| Resolution | 2800 px | 2880 px★ |
| Panel | — | OLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 600 nits★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | WiFi 6 | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| USB-C | — | 2★ |
| Cellular | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stylus Model | — | Slim Pen |
| Fingerprint Reader | — | ✗ |
| Face Unlock | — | ✓★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.57 kg★ | 0.87 kg |
| Battery | — | 47 Wh★ |
| OS | Android | Windows 11 Pro |
Pro e Contro
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 14.6" Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus
- Strong screen (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong ram (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average storage (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average battery (32nd percentile)
Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Surface Pro 11 Platinum 2025
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong storage (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
Prezzi
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 14.6" Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus0.047punteggio per dollaro
vs
Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Surface Pro 11 Platinum 20250.039punteggio per dollaro
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 14.6" Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.2x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Surface Pro 11
Scores 76 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 26 specs.
