SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Netac NV3000 250GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Netac
50 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
Specifiche
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Netac NV3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Dati non disponibili | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Dati non disponibili | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | — |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | Dati non disponibili | |
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Pro e Contro
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Netac NV3000 250GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong affordability (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (79th percentile)
- Below average capacity (13th percentile)13th %ile
Prezzi
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.043punteggio per dollaro
vs
Netac NV3000 250GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22801.011punteggio per dollaro
Netac NV3000 250GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 23.5x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.
