SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Kingston NV1 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
41 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
Specifiche
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Kingston NV1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Dati non disponibili | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Dati non disponibili | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC★ | — |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | — |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | Dati non disponibili | |
| MTBF (hours) | Dati non disponibili | |
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Pro e Contro
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Kingston NV1 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average capacity (27th percentile)
Prezzi
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.044punteggio per dollaro
vs
Kingston NV1 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 22800.319punteggio per dollaro
Kingston NV1 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 7.3x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.
