Crucial 8GB DDR4-3200 CL16 (CT8G4DFS8266)
Crucial
50 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Kingston (KF588CU42RW-24)
Kingston
71 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifiche
| Crucial 8GB DDR4 | Kingston | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 42 |
| Timings | 16-18-18-36 | — |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.399999976158142 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | — | ✓★ |
Pro e Contro
Crucial 8GB DDR4-3200 CL16 (CT8G4DFS8266)
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong affordability (78th percentile)
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Kingston (KF588CU42RW-24)
- Strong speed (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong latency (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (67th percentile)
Prezzi
Crucial 8GB DDR4-3200 CL16 (CT8G4DFS8266)0.847punteggio per dollaro
vs
Kingston (KF588CU42RW-24)0.361punteggio per dollaro
Crucial 8GB DDR4-3200 CL16 (CT8G4DFS8266) offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.3x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Kingston
Scores 71 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.
