ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS 24.5"

ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS 24.5"

ASUS
68 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025

Samsung
92 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Office
ASUS
68
Samsung
86
Creative
ASUS
64
Samsung
84
Gaming
ASUS
65
Samsung
83
Professional
ASUS
65
Samsung
81
Entertainment
ASUS
55
Samsung
78
Portable
ASUS
12
Samsung
14

Specifiche

ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS 24.5"Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Display
Size24.5"27"
Resolution1920 x 10802560 x 1440
Panel TypeIPSQD-OLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate310 Hz500 Hz
Response Time1 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync PremiumFreeSync Premium Pro
Color & HDR
Brightness400 nits300 nits
Color Gamut110% sRGB99% (CIE1976)
Color Depth8-bit10-bit
HDRDisplayHDR 400HDR10+
HDR SupportHDR10HDR10+
Connectivity
HDMI Ports12
DisplayPort11
USB-C13
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power18W140W
Weight5.58 kg6.90 kg

Pro e Contro

ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS 24.5"

  • Strong performance (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong color (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong portability (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average social proof (24th percentile)

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025

  • Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

Prezzi

ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS 24.5" is 301 USD cheaper (2.0x less).

ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS 24.5"0.227punteggio per dollaro
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.154punteggio per dollaro

ASUS ROG Strix XG259CMS 24.5" offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.5x migliore

Verdetto

Vincitore: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"

Scores 92 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 28 specs.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Migliore per:

GamingOfficeCreativeProfessionalEntertainment

Da considerare anche