ASUS ROG Strix XG249CM 24" Black 2022
ASUS
72 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Samsung Odyssey G60SD 27" Silver 2024
Samsung
95 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| ASUS ROG Strix XG249CM 24" | Samsung Odyssey G60SD 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 23.8" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 270 Hz | 360 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 105% sRGB | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 10-Bit★ |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | — | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 23W★ | 140W |
| Weight | 8.80 kg | 6.90 kg★ |
Pro e Contro
ASUS ROG Strix XG249CM 24" Black 2022
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong performance (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong portability (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average display (20th percentile)20th %ile
Samsung Odyssey G60SD 27" Silver 2024
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong color (91st percentile)91st %ile
Prezzi
ASUS ROG Strix XG249CM 24" Black 20220.241punteggio per dollaro
vs
Samsung Odyssey G60SD 27" Silver 20240.139punteggio per dollaro
ASUS ROG Strix XG249CM 24" Black 2022 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.7x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Samsung Odyssey G60SD 27"
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 29 specs.
