Samsung Odyssey G70D 27" Black 2025
Samsung
79 Punteggio complessivo
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACG 27" black
ASUS
74 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Creative
Office
Professional
Gaming
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| Samsung Odyssey G70D 27" | ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACG 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 180 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% sRGB, 99% CIE1931 | 95% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10+ | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR10+★ | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 0 | 1★ |
| Thunderbolt | 0 | — |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✗ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 78W★ | — |
| Weight | 7.10 kg★ | 7.76 kg |
Pro e Contro
Samsung Odyssey G70D 27" Black 2025
- Strong color (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (13th percentile)13th %ile
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACG 27" black
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong color (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong performance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
- Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
Prezzi
Samsung Odyssey G70D 27" Black 20250.212punteggio per dollaro
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACG 27" black0.381punteggio per dollaro
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACG 27" black offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.8x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Samsung Odyssey G70D 27"
Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 29 specs.
