ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
ASUS
96 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Samsung QMC QM75C 74.5"
Samsung
57 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" | Samsung QMC QM75C 74.5" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 75" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | LCD |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 8 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits | 500 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 72% NTSC |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓★ | — |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 400x400 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.70 kg★ | — |
Pro e Contro
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
Samsung QMC QM75C 74.5"
- Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong color (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (66th percentile)
- Below average performance (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average portability (24th percentile)
- Below average feature (25th percentile)
Prezzi
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 20240.174punteggio per dollaro
vs
Samsung QMC QM75C 74.5"0.025punteggio per dollaro
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 7.0x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 28 specs.
