Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 2022
Samsung
86 Punteggio complessivo
vs
ASUS ZenScreen MB229CF 22"
ASUS
47 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Office
Gaming
Entertainment
Professional
Creative
Portable
Specifiche
| Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" | ASUS ZenScreen MB229CF 22" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 32" | 21.5" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | VA | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,000 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 100 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | Adaptive-Sync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3 | 16.7 Million Colors (8-Bit) |
| Color Depth | 8-bit+FRC | 8-bit |
| HDR | HDR | — |
| HDR Support | HDR | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 2★ | 1 |
| Thunderbolt | 0 | — |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | — | 13W★ |
| Weight | 7.40 kg | 4.00 kg★ |
Pro e Contro
Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 2022
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong performance (88th percentile)88th %ile
ASUS ZenScreen MB229CF 22"
- Strong portability (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
- Strong ergonomic (70th percentile)
- Below average color (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
Prezzi
Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 20220.172punteggio per dollaro
vs
ASUS ZenScreen MB229CF 22"0.236punteggio per dollaro
ASUS ZenScreen MB229CF 22" offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.4x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32"
Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 30 specs.
