Viltrox

Viltrox

Viltrox
32 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
99 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Landscape
Viltrox
15
Sigma
100
Budget
Viltrox
35
Sigma
99
Travel
Viltrox
17
Sigma
97
Macro
Viltrox
15
Sigma
96
Portrait
Viltrox
53
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Viltrox
35
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
27
Sigma
87
Professional
Viltrox
30
Sigma
84
Street
Viltrox
38
Sigma
80

Specifiche

ViltroxSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min75 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max75 mm300 mm
Elements—20
Groups—14
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.83.5-6.7
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
Mount—Sony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight—0.61 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—HLA
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pro e Contro

Viltrox

  • Strong aperture (70th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (69th percentile)
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average build (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile

Prezzi

Viltrox is 365 USD cheaper (2.1x less).

Viltrox0.096punteggio per dollaro
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.143punteggio per dollaro

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.5x migliore

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche