Sigma Sports 598969 600mm
Sigma
51 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Fujifilm
79 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Professional
Macro
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Street
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Portrait
Specifiche
| Sigma Sports 598969 600mm | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | super-telephoto | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 300 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 600 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | 28 | 15 |
| Groups | 21 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | NPC (Nano Porous Coating), Water- and Oil-Repellent Coating, Super Multi-Layer Coating | Super EBC coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 13★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 3.98 kg | 0.37 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 2.80 m | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6 | 1:6.67 |
Pro e Contro
Sigma Sports 598969 600mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
- Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (33rd percentile)
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Prezzi
Sigma Sports 598969 600mm0.008punteggio per dollaro
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm0.075punteggio per dollaro
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 9.4x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Scores 79 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
