Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Voigtländer Ultron 27mm f/2.0 27mm
Voigtländer
57 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Specifiche
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Voigtländer Ultron 27mm f/2.0 27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 27 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 27 mm |
| Elements | — | 6 |
| Groups | — | 4 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/22 |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 10★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Fujifilm X |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | — | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:6.7★ |
Pro e Contro
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Voigtländer Ultron 27mm f/2.0 27mm
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Prezzi
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064punteggio per dollaro
vs
Voigtländer Ultron 27mm f/2.0 27mm0.095punteggio per dollaro
Voigtländer Ultron 27mm f/2.0 27mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.5x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Voigtländer Ultron 27mm f/2.0 27mm
Scores 57 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.
