Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Tamron
Tamron
72 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Specifiche
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Tamron | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | — | 20 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | 22-40★ |
| Min Aperture | — | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 1.53 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | VXD |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 191 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:3.8★ |
Pro e Contro
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Tamron
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong macro (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Prezzi
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064punteggio per dollaro
vs
Tamron0.102punteggio per dollaro
Tamron offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.6x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Tamron
Scores 72 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.
