Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Viltrox AF 24/1.8 Z 24mm
Viltrox
47 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Macro
Portrait
Professional
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Specifiche
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Viltrox AF 24/1.8 Z 24mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 24 mm |
| Elements | — | 11 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | HD Nano multi-layer coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weight | — | 0.37 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | STM+Lead Screw Stepper Motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 300 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:10★ |
Pro e Contro
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Viltrox AF 24/1.8 Z 24mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (78th percentile)
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Strong build (69th percentile)
- Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Prezzi
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064punteggio per dollaro
vs
Viltrox AF 24/1.8 Z 24mm0.124punteggio per dollaro
Viltrox AF 24/1.8 Z 24mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.9x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Viltrox AF 24/1.8 Z 24mm
Scores 47 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.
