Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Tamron
68 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Serounder 52mm Fisheye 52mm
Serounder
55 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Travel
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Specifiche
| Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm | Serounder 52mm Fisheye 52mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | fisheye |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 52 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 52 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 13 | 3 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Internal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating | anti-reflection film |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/18 | — |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Multiple |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Auto Focus | — |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 498 mm | 52 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.7★ | 0.35x |
Pro e Contro
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Serounder 52mm Fisheye 52mm
- Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
- Below average optical (35th percentile)
Prezzi
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm0.759punteggio per dollaro
vs
Serounder 52mm Fisheye 52mm1.466punteggio per dollaro
Serounder 52mm Fisheye 52mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.9x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Scores 68 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 20 specs.
