Zeiss Otus 1.4/35 35mm

Zeiss Otus 1.4/35 35mm

Zeiss
54 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
84 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Street
Zeiss
51
Sony
85
Travel
Zeiss
27
Sony
82
Budget
Zeiss
44
Sony
80
Portrait
Zeiss
76
Sony
80
Video Cinema
Zeiss
56
Sony
77
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
34
Sony
73
Professional
Zeiss
56
Sony
71
Landscape
Zeiss
35
Sony
68
Macro
Zeiss
61
Sony
61

Specifiche

Zeiss Otus 1.4/35 35mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements159
Groups118
Aspherical Elements14
ED Elements01
CoatingZEISS T coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/163.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades107
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
FormatFull-FrameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.74 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread67 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyPZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm249 mm
Max Magnification1:5.720.215x

Pro e Contro

Zeiss Otus 1.4/35 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (71th percentile)
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average build (31th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Prezzi

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm is 2.001 USD cheaper (7.7x less).

Zeiss Otus 1.4/35 35mm0.023punteggio per dollaro
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.282punteggio per dollaro

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 12.3x migliore

Verdetto

Vincitore: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Migliore per:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche