Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

Insta360
33 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm

Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm

Viltrox
69 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Street
Insta360
41
Viltrox
70
Professional
Insta360
35
Viltrox
67
Travel
Insta360
16
Viltrox
65
Portrait
Insta360
61
Viltrox
65
Budget
Insta360
35
Viltrox
64
Landscape
Insta360
13
Viltrox
60
Wildlife Sports
Insta360
31
Viltrox
60
Video Cinema
Insta360
42
Viltrox
60
Macro
Insta360
14
Viltrox
58

Specifiche

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mmViltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm
Optics
Typefisheyeprime
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements6
Groups6
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
Coatingmultilayer nanocoating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.94f/4.5
Min Aperturef/1.94f/4.5
Constant
Build
MountInsta360 X4 AirSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.06 kg
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm
Max Magnification1:10

Pro e Contro

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm

  • Strong aperture (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average build (27th percentile)

Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Prezzi

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm is 75 USD cheaper (4.1x less).

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm1.371punteggio per dollaro
vs
Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm0.698punteggio per dollaro

Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.0x migliore

Verdetto

Vincitore: Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm

Scores 69 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche