Sigma 200110

Sigma 200110

Sigma
66 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
80 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Macro
Sigma
75
Nikon
79
Budget
Sigma
63
Nikon
78
Portrait
Sigma
64
Nikon
78
Video Cinema
Sigma
57
Nikon
76
Professional
Sigma
56
Nikon
74
Street
Sigma
57
Nikon
68
Landscape
Sigma
66
Nikon
66
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
52
Nikon
59
Travel
Sigma
48
Nikon
58

Specifiche

Sigma 200110Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min12 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm35 mm
Elements1617
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements42
CoatingSuper Multi CoatingNano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4.5f/4
Min Aperture4.5-5.6f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon FNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weight0.61 kg0.68 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm290 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Pro e Contro

Sigma 200110

  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (71st percentile)
  • Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (74th percentile)

Prezzi

Sigma 200110 is 116 USD cheaper (1.2x less).

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Verdetto

Vincitore: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Scores 80 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche