Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon
78 Punteggio complessivo
vs
7Artisans AF27mmF2.8 27mm

7Artisans AF27mmF2.8 27mm

7Artisans
42 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Macro
Canon
83
7Artisans
46
Travel
Canon
82
7Artisans
39
Street
Canon
77
7Artisans
40
Budget
Canon
72
7Artisans
37
Landscape
Canon
72
7Artisans
32
Professional
Canon
66
7Artisans
31
Wildlife Sports
Canon
65
7Artisans
26
Video Cinema
Canon
64
7Artisans
28
Portrait
Canon
63
7Artisans
32

Specifiche

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS7Artisans AF27mmF2.8 27mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min18 mm27 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm27 mm
Elements166
Groups125
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra Coatingnano-coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6f/16
Min Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades66
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.10 kg0.17 kg
Filter Thread67 mm39 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMicro Motorautomatic and manual focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance135 mm300 mm

Pro e Contro

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

7Artisans AF27mmF2.8 27mm

  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Prezzi

7Artisans AF27mmF2.8 27mm is 132 USD cheaper (2.3x less).

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS0.329punteggio per dollaro
vs
7Artisans AF27mmF2.8 27mm0.410punteggio per dollaro

7Artisans AF27mmF2.8 27mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.2x migliore

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Verdetto

Vincitore: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Scores 78 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche